I'm sorry I haven't written in you in a long time. This has been a crazy year. And I don't mind telling you that it has been crazy in an awful way. 2008? Not my favorite year.
How've you been? Oh, is that baby spider still the latest post? I see...
Well how about this: A review of that microscope I was so excited about. Remember that? Good times! Turns out it wsn't that great. I mean, it worked, but it wasn't worth the $300. It didn't have any sort of fine-focus. The digital output was for file transfer only. No live imaging on the PC. The biggest drawback, though, was the photo capture feature. I know, right? The single function for which I bought the thing.
The capture button was located below the LCD viewscreen. The viewscreen itself was pretty shoddy, and had a native resolution far below that of the actual images so it was difficult to tell whether the subject was in focus or not. Most of the time I had to pop the .jpgs over to the computer to see whether they turned out. Worse, actually pressing the capture button would shake the whole microscope to the point that in-focus photography was an exercise in frustration. It was a major annoyance at 40x, but at 400x it was awful. It didn't help that the scope itself weighed so little. (Although some may say that that's a good thing.) A week of valiant effort convinced me to return the microscope to Amazon.
You know, if I found this thing for about $100, it might be okay. But $300 is far more than it's worth, in my opinion. Below are some of the better pictures. I don't even know how many I threw out. A lot.
The molted exoskeleton of an aphid (so it's partially inside-out) at 40x.

The same guy at 100x.

...and at 400x. This is its leg. You can see it gets hard to focus.

Here's the wing of... something. I forgot to write it down. (It's been a while since I took these.) 40x
100x
400x
(abandoned) spider web at 40x
100x
400x. I love that you can see the "glue" droplets along its length.
And lastly, Moth scales.
@40x
@100x
and @400x
Man, that's a lot of stuff.



